|
Mary Vukich
Update
- May 25, 2005
Mary is now
12 years old and a beautiful young lady. To look at her,
one would never think 'cancer patient'. She is vibrant, healthy
and
active. She has no deficits other than the impaired vision that
alerted us to her brain tumors. Every day that I get out of bed
I
look at her and think how blessed we were that Dr. Burzynski
perservered!! Mary was off of antineoplastons for 1 year and off
of
AminoCare for 2 months this past April when her MRI showed a tiny
but suspicious spot. We did not waste any time and immediately
put her back on oral antineoplastons. She takes (4) A pills and
(4) B pills
six times a day. The spot is gone and she has every indication
of a
long and healthy life. We hope that she will finish this course
of
meds this fall. She has taken it all in stride and continues to
inspire everyone she talks to! Also, I don't know if I mentioned
that
Mary's left side was paralyzed (L hemiparesis) during her treatment
in 1999 and is fully recovered now-we were told that might never
come
back. I hope that other patients find that inspiring as well.
Mary
dances on pointe in ballet. Please feel free to contact us any
time
of the day or night if we can help.
Karen
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Mary Vukich
was diagnosed with Multifocal Astrocytoma on October 8, 1999.
The MRI revealed 6 brain tumors deep inside her brain. They were
diffuse and inoperable. Mary was offered conventional chemotherapy,
Vincristine and Carboplatinum, with side effects too numerous
to list and a life ending prognosis.
Mary started
injections of Antineoplastons in Houston, Texas on November 11,
1999. On December 17, 1999, the MRI revealed a 19.2% shrinkage.
On January 17, 2000, the MRI revealed a 41.7% shrinkage, which
was total shrinkage of all six tumors. On April 12, 2000, the
MRI revealed a partial remission. Her neurology team in Cleveland
described her MRI as Excellent. On August 12, 2000,
Mary discontinued IV form of Antineoplastons and started on Antineoplaston
capsules.
Mary had noticeable
paralysis on her left side during treatment. Her brother Joshua,
age 12, provided her with physical therapy to prevent muscle atrophy.
Mary has recovered her full strength on her left side, which amazed
her Cleveland doctors.
On October
8, 2001, the latest PET and MRI were performed. The MRI showed
spots around the optic nerve but the PET scan revealed no hypermetabolic
cancerous activity. Dr. Burzynski announced to the family that
Mary was free of malignant tumors. Mary is currently approaching
complete remission with what is described as scar tissue where
the tumor once resided.
Mary is a
dancer and performed for a European film crew and the Burzynski
Clinic staff in Houston on November 7, 2001. Marys brother
Joshua performed with Mary, lifting her up in the air in a circular
motion while Mary smiled profusely. Mary has performed publicly
and has plans to be a professional dancer, artist, and massage
therapist.
Mark, Karen,
Joshua, and Mary Vukich thank the living God and Jesus the Christ
for shepherding them to Dr. Stanislaw Burzynski. We thank Dr.
Burzynski and his family for carrying on all these years. We pray
for the living God to bless the Burzynski family and the entire
staff at the Burzynski Clinic.
Marys
story is archived on the Akron Beacon Journal web-site at www.ohio.com
or you may call the Akron Beacon Journal toll free at 1-877-409-0357
to receive directions on how to find her story. The date of her
front-page story was posted on February 11, 2001.
Mary speaks
a little polish as she is 25% polish. She tells Dr. Burzynski
in polish, I Love You Like a Father!
For those
who are familiar with Thomas Navarros story, Mary is mourning
his loss. Mary met Thomas 2 years ago, the week she started her
treatment.
Mary cannot
be reconciled with the fact that Thomas was prevented from the
same treatment that she received in 1999.
Mary knows
Thomas is home with Jesus Christ but as she puts it, Why?
Why daddy couldnt Thomas get the treatment?
Our deepest sympathy to the Navarro family.
Family finds
hope for cure with maverick oncologist
Copyright © 2001 The Seattle Times Company
By Tracy Wheeler
Knight Ridder Newspapers
AKRON, Ohio
- Mary Vukich's first-grade homework had turned into an indecipherable
blur. She could hold it at arm's length. She could hold it right
up against her nose. Nothing but fuzzy, black shapes on a white
page.
Certainly,
she needed glasses.
So one Thursday
morning in fall 1999, Mark and Karen Vukich took their 7-year-old
daughter to an eye doctor. They left his office, though, not with
a prescription for glasses but with an appointment for a brain
scan early the next morning.
"You
go from one day thinking that your child needs glasses,"
Karen Vukich said, "and then, boom."
Cancer.
There were
six tumors tucked deep inside Mary's brain.
Like roots
from a tree trunk, the cancer, pilocytic astrocytoma, had woven
its way into her brain, one tumor growing into six, eliminating
surgery as an option.
Cancer specialists
at the Cleveland Clinic could offer only chemotherapy and a cloudy
prognosis.
The Vukiches,
both nurses, wanted a treatment that wouldn't make Mary nauseated
or bald or damage her nerves, bone marrow or liver. They wanted
a cure. They wanted hope.
And they found
it in Houston in the clinic of a renegade oncologist, Dr. Stanislaw
Burzynski, who has fought off the Food and Drug Administration
(FDA) and the Texas Medical Board to treat patients with a unique
cancer-fighting treatment that he discovered, developed and sells.
He calls it
antineoplastons.
Every cancer
contains two types of genes: an oncogene, which accelerates cancer
growth, and a tumor-suppressor gene, which halts that acceleration.
"What
we know," Burzynski said, "is that the antineoplastons
work as molecular switches, to turn off the oncogene and turn
on the tumor-suppressor genes."
It's a treatment
hailed as a miracle by many of his patients - 6,000 since 1977
- who have fought off cancer of the brain, breast, cervix, colon,
uterus, stomach, lungs and bladder.
But it is
also a treatment under heavy suspicion.
The FDA said
Burzynski offers no proof that his medicine works. The National
Cancer Institute said government-sponsored laboratory testing
of antineoplastons has shown no cancer-fighting effect. The Cancer
Letter, an industry bulletin, found that Burzynski's own studies
were "so flawed" the data were "meaningless."
And the Mayo
Clinic, in a 1999 trial, found that the antineoplastons had no
effect on the cancer of any patient.
None of that
swayed the Vukiches. What mattered to them were the testimonials
from Burzynski's patients, who had beaten cancer through these
experimental antineoplastons.
"We chose
this treatment for no other reason than that it offered the chance
of a cure," Karen Vukich said.
It was Oct.
8, 1999, when the brain scan revealed Mary's tumors. Though astrocytoma
is a slow-growing cancer, the tumors already had grown deep into
her brain, creating enough pressure to blur Mary's vision.
The doctors
wanted to start chemo right away. The Vukiches said no.
As registered
nurses - Karen at the Cleveland Clinic and Mark at a nursing home
- they know what chemotherapy does to a person's quality of life.
Beyond that,
they didn't expect that treatment would work for Mary.
Chemotherapy
attacks the fastest-growing cells in the body, which for most
cancer patients are the cancer cells. Mary's cancer, however,
was growing slowly. In her body, normal cells would be killed
along with the cancerous ones.
"Where
does that lead you?" Mark Vukich asked. "To misery and
suffering. We were really prepared to take her anywhere else.
Out of the country. Mexico. If we had to stay out of the U.S.
until she died, we would have."
Dr. Bruce
Cohen, Mary's doctor and the head of pediatric neurology at the
Cleveland Clinic, said chemotherapy would have offered a chance
but no guarantees.
"With
standard therapy, it's really difficult to say because these tumors
have their own minds," Cohen said. "With astrocytoma,
in general, 60 percent are alive at 20 years. Some die within
five years. It's difficult to predict.
"It's
like a tank: You can usually outrun a tank, but if you can't,
it can crush you."
The Vukiches
weren't going to get into a footrace with the tank. Karen scoured
medical books. Mark trolled the Internet.
They began
to consider the cancer clinics of Mexico, where diet, "detoxification,"
Laetrile, shark cartilage and a slew of other well-worn, unproven
alternative treatments abound.
Then they
found Burzynski and his antineoplastons. By Nov. 9, 1999, Mary
and her mother were on their way to Houston to begin treatment.
Cohen didn't fully support the Vukiches' decision. But he also
didn't fight it.
"As a
physician, I can't give my blessing to unproven therapies outside
of mainstream medicine," he said. "But if I thought
it was the wrong thing to do, if I thought they were abusing the
child by doing this, if I thought this doctor was nothing more
than a quack, I'd be obligated to report them to family services.
But they made this decision based on unproven but scientifically
sound methods."
With another
type of cancer, the doctor might have felt differently. Depending
on the cancer, "you could be risking your child's life by
doing this," he said.
Cohen knew
of several cases of astrocytoma that had responded to antineoplastons.
"I've
heard of about seven or eight or nine," Cohen said. "But
I don't know if he (Burzynski) treated eight and got eight responses
or treated 100 and got eight responses. I haven't seen the information
published in a (medical) journal."
That's because
it hasn't been.
For more than
a decade, Burzynski has been stalked by criticism that his clinical
trials are sloppy and meaningless, making them unlikely to be
published in the strict world of medical journals.
The journal
Mayo Clinic Proceedings presented the most recent published data
on antineoplastons. The study was conducted by the Mayo Clinic,
and the results were unfavorable, finding that none of the nine
cancer patients treated showed measurable improvement.
Burzynski,
though, charged that the study was purposely flawed because the
Mayo researchers used only half the antineoplaston dose that was
needed.
"Obviously,
if it's so low, you know you won't get good results," Burzynski
said. "These guys knew it."
The Mayo Clinic's
response: The dosage plan was acceptable to Burzynski before the
trial began; his opposition came only after the results were in.
Burzynski's
own findings are much different from the Mayo Clinic's.
In a 1999
study, he reviewed the cases of 36 brain-tumor patients treated
at his clinic. Of those, 16 had complete or partial responses.
"We can
cure cancer that's not treatable by other means," he said,
pointing to results such as these.
Burzynski
is widely criticized for his one-man approach. He identified,
developed, administers, sells and studies antineoplastons, with
none of the usual involvement from pharmaceutical companies and
none of the usual partnerships with other researchers.
And his fees
to patients are steep. For intravenous treatments, the cost is
about $7,200 a month. Pills cost about $2,500 per month. And insurance
doesn't usually cover any of that cost.
Burzynski
dismisses criticism, saying he has 130 medical doctors on his
staff who work closely with the patients. And his current research
- 500 patients in 72 antineoplaston trials - is being monitored
by the FDA per federal-court order.
"In dealing
with deadly tumors, you can't cheat," Burzynski said. "Patients
either live or die."
Antineoplastons
are actually peptides - strings of amino acids - that occur naturally
in the body. As a medical student in the 1960s, Burzynski noticed
that these peptides were plentiful in healthy patients but almost
nonexistent in cancer patients. He came up with the theory that
if antineoplastons were replenished in cancer patients, their
bodies would be given the ability to fight off cancer.
The side effects
are minimal, with the most common being elevated sodium levels,
which can lead to brain swelling, a potentially life-threatening
problem for those with brain cancer. It's a side effect, though,
that can be avoided by drinking a gallon of water a day.
High doses
of steroids are prescribed to almost all brain-cancer patients
to keep brain swelling down. Those steroids, in turn, lead to
extreme weight gain.
When she was
diagnosed with cancer, Mary Vukich weighed 45 pounds. During her
eight months of steroid treatment, her weight soared to 81 pounds.
Not only were the antineoplastons being pumped into her 24 hours
a day, via a permanent intravenous tube near her collarbone, but
the steroids were going in through the IV, too.
Before all
this, Mary had been a typical little girl.
She rode horses,
played the violin and took ballet lessons.
After she
returned from Houston on Dec. 2, 1999, most of those activities
stopped. She was fatigued. She was lugging around a 7-pound pump
24 hours a day.
The payoff,
though, was immediate. Within two weeks, her tumors had shrunk
by 19 percent, and a month later by 41 percent.
The trend
was encouraging, but didn't excite conventional oncologists, who
need to see a tumor shrink by 50 percent to be considered a "partial
response."
Then last
March, the shrinking seemed to stop.
Cohen and
his colleagues at the Cleveland Clinic worried that the cancer
was coming back. Burzynski saw it differently, telling the Vukiches
that he suspected the cancer debris was dissipating, giving the
illusion that the tumor hadn't shrunk.
The brain
scan on April 12 was shocking. Where the once-overwhelming white
masses had confirmed the cancer's presence, there were now just
shadows.
"You
can see, it's basically gone," Mark Vukich said, holding
up a copy of the brain scan. "It's unbelievable."
Burzynski
said Mary is now "in complete remission." Some residual
cancer cells remain, he said, but her last scan in November showed
no metabolic activity.
"It was
absolutely a good decision," Cohen said of the Vukiches'
choice to see Burzynski. "If the same response had come from
conventional chemotherapy, we would have been thrilled."
Mary is still
taking the antineoplastons - 48 pills each day. She'll continue
to take them at a cost of about $2,500 per month until no residual
tumors remain. The steroids, though, are gone, and Mary's weight
is back to normal.
And just recently,
another brain scan at the Cleveland Clinic showed that the cancer
continues to be erased.
"It's
one thing to expect a cure," Karen Vukich said. "It's
another to see it."
Copyright
© 2001 The Seattle Times Company
|